Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Wall v. Kiser et al
as 7:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
Lt. J. Kiser, A. Gallihar, W. Swiney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendy D. Swiney, LLC v. Legacy Care, LLC
as 3:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Wendy D. Swiney, LLC
Defendant:
Legacy Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Makdessi v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Jeffrey Kiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Mathena et al
as 7:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick and Steven Riddick
Defendant:
Collins, Mathena, Gallihar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. McDuffie et al
as 7:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Phipps, Stallard, Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Gary Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Rainey et al
as 7:2020cv00253
Defendant:
Swiney, Gilbert, Randall Mathena and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Patrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Denise Malone, Henry Ponton, Earl Barksdale and others
Plaintiff:
Tyquine R. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
