Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
In re: Syntax Brillian Corp
as 13-1959
Debtor: In the Matter of: SYNTAX BRILLIAN CORP
Plaintiff - Appellant: SB LIQUIDATION TRUST
Defendant - Appellee: PREFERRED BANK
In re: Syntax Brillian Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1373
Debtor - Appellee: In the Matter of: SYNTAX BRILLIAN CORP
Plaintiff - Appellant: SB LIQUIDATION TRUST
Defendant - Appellee: PREFERRED BANK
In Re: Syntax Brillian Corp
as 13-8023
Debtor: In re: SYNTAX BRILLIAN CORP, et al
Plaintiff - Petitioner: SB LIQUIDATION TRUST
Defendant - Respondent: PREFERRED BANK
In re: Syntax-Brillian Corp
as 12-8099
Debtor: In re: SYNTAX BRILLIAN CORP, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: SB LIQUIDATION TRUST
Defendant - Appellee: PREFERRED BANK
TECO Electric & Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp.
as 2:2008cv01105
Plaintiff: TECO Electric & Machinery Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Syntax-Brillian Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Bloomfield, Inc. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp. et al
as 2:2008cv00236
Plaintiff: Bloomfield, Inc., Bloomfield, Inc. and Bloomfield, Inc.
Defendant: Syntax-Brillian Corp., Vincent Sollitto, Jr, James Li and others
Movant: New Haven Policemen and Firemen's Pension Fund, City of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Tsirekidze v. Syntax-Brillian Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02204
Plaintiff: Teimuraz Tsirekidze
Defendant: Syntax-Brillian Corp., Vincent F. Solitto, Jr. and Wayne Pratt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff: IMCA, Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05020
Plaintiff: Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05019
Plaintiff: Scott Eisler
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?