Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BLAKE v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2023cv11445
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, T BUTLER, RICHBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. SCHROCK et al
as 3:2023cv08552
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
SCHROCK, J DUNN, HARVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv49443
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY T BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldberg et al v. City of Woodstock, Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv02604
Plaintiff:
Michael Goldberg and Debra Goldberg
Defendant:
City of Woodstock, Georgia, Shane R. Bonebrake, Joshua C. Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS, JR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JULIE L JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. PERRY
as 5:2013cv00075
Petitioner:
LENORRIS T BUTLER
Respondent:
PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURRY v. LOGAN
as 4:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WARDELL CURRY
Defendant:
J LOGAN, T THOMAS, T BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Rivera v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-11335
Movant - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOE T, BUTLER, H. J. SERMON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Beier v. Butler, et al
as 8:1999cv00754
Petitioner:
Richard W. Beier
Respondent:
Joe T. Butler and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
