Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Brooks v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 6:2024cv06020
Plaintiff:
Dale Roslyn Brooks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Arkansas, State of, D Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dale Roslyn Brooks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Arkansas, State of, D Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06157
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne, Dr. Guy M. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06118
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne and Dr. Guy M. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Smith et al
as 5:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Russell, D Payne, Naylor and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morningstar v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Willis, Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Khanis-Orion Morningstar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Kelley et al
as 5:2018cv00198
Defendant:
A Culclager, Richard T Ball and Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Jeramye Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Burl et al
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gilliam, III
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Larie A Taylor, Justine M Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gilliam, III
Defendant:
Wendy L Kelly, Angela Gamble, Candace C Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
