Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Anthony Lee v. Department of the Army
as 24-10703
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. LEE
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Riteway Truck and Auto et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Miles T. Lee
Defendant:
Riteway Truck and Auto doing business as KO Towing Comp, Mr. Ray Tews, Gregory, Dole, Calhoun, and Rogers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv03872
Plaintiff:
Tonita T. Lee
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Freeman v. Zona et al
as 3:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman
Defendant:
J. Zona, T. Lee and Other Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Governor, State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv14254
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lee
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Zona et al
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman
Defendant:
J. Zona, T. Lee, Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Butler v. Warden, et al
as 22-11372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL WAYNE BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, M. CORRALES, Assistant Warden, D. GREEN, Major of Security and others
Lee v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2021cv80681
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lee
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler v. Colon et al
as 1:2020cv25123
Defendant:
Major of Security D. Green, Assistant Warden M. Corrales, Warden J. Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Butler and Darryl Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
