Cases 1 - 10 of 62
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gerald Ashford v. James Hill et al
as 5:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ashford
Defendant:
James Hill, T. Lee, B. Castorena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gebrezgie v. Phillips et al
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Yohannes Gebrezgie
Defendant:
K. Phillips, K. Matta, V. Marmolejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gebrezgie v. Phillips et al
as 1:2021cv01626
Plaintiff:
Yohannes Gebrezgie
Defendant:
K. Phillips, K. Matta, V. Marmolejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv07136
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, J. Stout, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Defendant:
L. Johnson, J. Osequera, D. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus R. Ellington v. California Dept of Corr. and Rehab. et al
as 2:2021cv07364
Plaintiff:
Marcus R. Ellington, Sr.
Defendant:
California Dept of Corr. and Rehab., Lancaster State Prisons Religious Review Committee, T. Lewandowski, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bates v. Darling et al
as 2:2021cv01613
Plaintiff:
William Bates
Defendant:
Chad Darling, Joshua Bullard, Condon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
