Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Silvan v. AT&T Services, et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Not Yet Classified:
Sara Silvan and AT&T Mobility Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
J.N. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv05217
Plaintiff:
J.N.
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc doing business as T-Mobile and Michael L. Adams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sabella, et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2018cv09696
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
Salvador Sabella and Sabella's Plumbing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Phillips-Berry v. Kenner Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv08235
Defendant:
Apple, Metro PCS Communication Inc, Kenner Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Shanta G. Phillips-Berry
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Small v. Federal Government et al
as 2:2018cv04659
Plaintiff:
Clarence Adolph Small
Defendant:
Federal Government, Government of Louisiana, U.S. Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. AT&T Mobility Disability Benefits Program et al
as 2:2013cv06282
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Thomas
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Disability Benefits Program, AT&T Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dantin v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 2:2013cv02625
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dantin
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Wright et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Clara Wright and Dennis Drury
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Ishmael v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00590
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
Larry Ishmael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
