Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CANNAFAX v. BUCKS COUNTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
JEREMY TYLER CANNAFAX and JEREMY KYLE CANNAFAX
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN MATELLUS, DEPUTY WARDEN KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell May v. Eric Bradley, et al
as 20-1729
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, J. RICHARDSON, Trust Fund Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Melvin Pollard v. Steve Merlak, et al
as 12-3841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN POLLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE MERLAK, B YINGLING, ROBERT WERLINGER and others
Shane Buczek v. R. Werlinger, et al
as 12-3766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WERLINGER and T. MONTGOMERY
BUCZEK v. WERLINGER et al
as 3:2012cv00112
Petitioner:
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
Respondent:
R. WERLINGER and T. MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POLLARD v. MERLAK et al
as 3:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
MELVIN POLLARD
Defendant:
STEVE MERLAK, B. YINGLING, ROBERT WERLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SONDS v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 3:2011cv00147
Petitioner:
REGINALD SONDS
Respondent:
P GRIFFITHS, JOHN YOST, R. WERLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mikanda v. Hillman et al
as 1:2010cv01492
Plaintiff:
Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant:
Noel L. Hillman, J. Ronald Chillemi, Matthew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONTGOMERY et al v. AC & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82998
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., MORSE-DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
RICKEY T. MONTGOMERY and DEBORAH MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
