Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(PC) McCardie v. Nolan et al
as 2:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Freddy McCardie
Defendant:
T. Nolan, CDCR, Dease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. v. NSJ Motorsports, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv00564
Defendant:
NSJ Motorsports, Ltd., Robert T. Nolan, Barbara Jones Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luckett v. Neuschmid et al
as 5:2018cv07695
Defendant:
Ersie Joyner, Jennifer Mihalovich, Herbert Webber and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Luckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lena v. Fred Foulk, et al
as 17-15854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED FOULK, Warden, CONNIE DAVIS, R. WILLIAMS and others
Nolan v. Krueger
as 1:2017cv01165
Petitioner:
Jackie T Nolan
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lena v. Foulk, et al.
as 2:2015cv02276
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Defendant:
Fred Foulk, Connie Davis, R. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLAN et al v. LOUIS SHERMAN COMPANY
as 2:2013cv06801
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE T. NOLAN , JAMES A. GLONER and USW DISTRICT 10, LOCAL 286 PENSION PLAN
Defendant:
LOUIS SHERMAN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-73444
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW TATE, M. D. MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
Samuel Anderson v. Matthew Tate, et al
as 11-16376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW TATE, M. D. MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
