Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Crow Law Firm Inc. v. Oby T. Rogers, PLLC et al
as 1:2018cv00808
Plaintiff:
Crow Law Firm Inc.
Defendant:
Oby T. Rogers, PLLC and Oby T. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Oklahoma
as 5:2013cv00453
Petitioner:
Demetrius T Rogers
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Oklahoma Bar Association et al
as 5:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T Rogers
Defendant:
Oklahoma Bar Association and Gina Hendryx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Denecke
as 12-6198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS T. ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND E. DENECKE
Rogers v. Denecke
as 5:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T Rogers
Defendant:
Raymond E Denecke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 11-3124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections, BILL CUMMINGS, Deputy Secretary of Corrections/Risk Management, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
McKinzy, Sr. v. Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement et al
as 2:2010cv02015
Plaintiff:
Michael E. McKinzy, Sr.
Defendant:
Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement, Christine T. Rogers, Robert M. Schieber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. McKune, et al
as 08-3253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, JOHN R COOLING, ROBERT ARNOLD and others
Smith v. McKune, et al
as 08-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R MC KUNE, Warden, JOHN R COOLING, ROBERT ARNOLD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
