Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lotusflower v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower
Defendant:
Charlotte Headley, Alishia McColl, Boschulte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hultgren et al
as 1:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Maurice T Brown
Defendant:
Brian Hultgren, Franklin Co Prosecutors Ofc, Craig Stillwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ng v. Wong et al
as 2:2019cv01371
Defendant:
T Brown, Jim Rogers, Janet Helson and others
Plaintiff:
Sing Cho Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ng v. Metz et al
as 2:2018cv01212
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Bing Kung Association, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sing Cho Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Daviscourt v. Claybrook et al
as 2:2018cv01148
Defendant:
As Yet Unknown Special Agents, Agents, Officers and Officials of the Office of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, As Yet Unknown Agents, Officers and Officials of the Office of General Counsel for the U S Department of Treasury, Yael Bortnick and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Daviscourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Brown v. Smith et al
as 4:2018cv05106
Defendant:
Edith Kroha, James Duncan, Kenneth Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice T Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Doe
as 4:2018cv05025
Plaintiff:
Maurice T Brown
Defendant:
Jane and/or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00376
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Saul T Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Gage et al
as 2:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Bruce Gage, The State of Washington, Washington Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00333
Plaintiff:
Victoria T Browning
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
