Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Gu et al v. YK Law. LLP et al
as 1:2022cv05409
Plaintiff:
Norton Gu and Muyang Babe Fairy Toys Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
YK Law, Henry Li, Edward T Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Arunachalam v. McNamara
as 21-110
Respondent:
RAYMOND C. CLEVENGER, III, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., TODD M. HUGHES and others
Petitioner:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Brian McNamara, et al
as 20-3290
Defendant:
THOMAS S. HIXSON, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, RAYMOND C. CLEVENGER, III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Amicus Curiae:
DANIEL BRUNE, SHERNA MADAN, M.D., FRED GARCIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08393
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Arunachalam v. McNamara et al
as 1:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Thomas S. Hixson, Brian J. McNamara, Raymond C. Clevenger, III and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Bragel International Inc. v. Stickiebra Company, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03699
Defendant:
Xing T. Chen, Stickiebra Company, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Bragel International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RIVERA VASQUEZ et al v. MR. CHEN'S, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01843
Defendant:
SHIAUFENG T. CHEN, MR. CHEN'S, INC., SHIAUFENG TOM CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE RIVERA VASQUEZ and MARIA BAUTISTA SORIANO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arunachalam v. Davila et al
as 3:2018cv02488
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
Edward J. Davila, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Eric M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalco Company v. Chen
as 3:2017mc00331
Plaintiff:
Nalco Company
Defendant:
David T Chen
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mayna Chau-Barlow v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 5:2016cv01694
Defendant:
Ballard Rehabilitation Hospital, Van T Chen, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mayna Chau-Barlow
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
