Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RYAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RYAN
Defendant:
R. ROBINSON, T. JONES and M. CASTELLANOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. OWENS et al
as 1:2017cv02634
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. JONES
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv00569
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. BITENER et al
as 1:2015cv03185
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
BITENER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JONES et al v. NASIRADDIN et al
as 1:2008cv02416
Plaintiff:
MELVIN T. JONES and DELORES JONES
Defendant:
MUHAMMED NASIRADDIN, JOHN DOE OWNERS AND OPERATORS PLURAL (1-10), CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
INSIGNIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC v. SCHOTTENSTEIN et al
as 3:2007cv04853
Plaintiff:
INSIGNIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
ARYEH M. SCHOTTENSTEIN, SARA SCHOTTENSTEIN, DAVID B. SCHOTTENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
