Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Daniels v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Brandon Daniels
Defendant:
Armstrong, Leabough and Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Beasley v. Larry Leabough
as 25-6839
Plaintiff:
WALTER RAY BEASLEY
Defendant:
LARRY LEABOUGH, Superindendent and EDWARD BLACKWELL, Chaplin
Fisher v. Butler et al
as 2:2025cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kendal Fisher
Defendant:
Butler and Leabough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Beasley v. T. Peyton
as 24-6047
Plaintiff:
MR. WALTER RAY BEASLEY
Defendant:
MRS. T. PEYTON, Kitchen Supervisor, MR. LARRY LEABOUGH, Head Superintendent, MR. MARK CULVER, Lieutenant and others
Omari Mason v. McKelvin #81
as 23-7201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, FRANK MACK, Major, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Williams v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Williams
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Larry Leabough, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Leabough et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, Tojuanna Mack, Edward Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Ferguson v. Leabough, et al
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Lacy Ferguson
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, Armstrong, Major Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Beasley v. T. Peyton, et al.
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
T. Peyton, Larry Leabough, Mark Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Omari Mason v. Kevin Talley
as 23-6483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, MAJOR FRANK MACK, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Defendant:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Regular Correctional Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
