Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dixon v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Gary Rose, E. A. Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
H. Joyner, D. Altizer, Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Hurley et al
as 7:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Marti Bell
Defendant:
S. Hurley, T. Melvin and T. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant:
A. Carter, J. Price, M. Lefever and others
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kapri v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00117
Defendant:
L. Moore, Lt. T. Melvin, William Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Kapri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiroz v. Bureau of Prison Staff et al
as 7:2020cv00112
Defendant:
J. Preston, Bureau of Prison Staff, LT. T. Melvin and others
Plaintiff:
Michel Quiroz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00103
Respondent:
Correctional Officer S. Howard, Defendants Unknown, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Tony T. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2020cv00060
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Hunley, J. Price and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Hicks v. M.S. Evans, et al
as 12-17616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
M.S. EVANS, Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, GEORGE A. NEOTTI, Warden, Chief Deputy Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden and others
Michael Hicks v. M.S. Evans, et al
as 11-16085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
M.S. EVANS, Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, G. A. NEOTTI, Chief Deputy Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
