Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tate et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv07506
Plaintiff:
Cierra Harbin, Christopher Harbin, Cali McCuller and others
Defendant:
Oscar D. Benavides, Curtis L. Weathersby, Sean Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massa et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11761
Plaintiff:
Owen McCaffrey, Miles Gordon, James McLoughlin and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1657
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Borders El Bey v. Doe #31 et al
as 6:2017cv06565
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
John Doe #31, John Doe #32, Marianne Yaru and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STRICKLER v. ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv03911
Plaintiff:
LISA STRICKLER
Defendant:
ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC and JAMES T. MULLIGAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KIM v. ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01397
Plaintiff:
YONG SANG KIM
Defendant:
ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC and JAMES T. MULLIGAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HENRY v. AMERICAN CREDIT & COLLECTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv03100
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HENRY
Defendant:
AMERICAN CREDIT & COLLECTIONS, LLC, JOHN O'MALLLEY, JAMES T. MULLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
