Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Faith Recovery Center, Inc. v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv03978
Plaintiff:
Faith Recovery Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher T. Robinson and Medica Health Plans Corporation, d/b/a Medica Self Insured, d/b/a Medica Insurance Company, d/b/a Medica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patricia Cooper v. City of Fairfield, et al
as 23-15326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA V. COOPER, individually and as successor-in-interest to Zachary T. Robinson; and as Guardian Ad Litem for Minors Z. R; Z. R, Jr.; and D. R
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FAIRFIELD, FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, KENNAN SIEVERS, Officer and others
(HC) Robinson v. Warden Trate
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Darregus T. Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nicholas Stone v. T. Robinson, et al
as 22-16587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. ROBINSON, Y. YANG, LVN, R. DAVID and others
(PC) Stone v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2019cv00703
Defendant:
T. Robinson, BPT Commissioner M. Perez, Gonzakis and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Robinson et al
as 3:2019cv02591
Defendant:
T. Robinson, Gonzakis, Y. Yang and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 3:2015cv02169
Plaintiff:
Leon Eugene Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Begley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Barren, Sr. v. T. Robinson, et al
as 14-16792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY D. BARREN, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
T. ROBINSON, Officer P7466, R. KENT, Officer P6179 and D. SHANE, Officer P6727
Darregus T Robinson v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv01318
Petitioner:
DARREGUS T ROBINSON
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
