Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Thompson et al v. CPS Acquisition Company
as 1:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Larry K. Thompson and Marilyn T. Thompson
Defendant:
CPS Acquisition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01238
Defendant:
Wayne-Kent A. Bradshaw, Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Howard v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00706
Defendant:
Wayne-Kent A. Bradshaw, Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Howard
Lopez v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Daniel A. Medina, Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Pinkney v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
Chris Pinkney
Defendant:
Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck, Virgil Roberts and others
(PC) Wilson v. Shelton et al
as 2:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lamel Jowan Wilson
Defendant:
J. Pickett, T. Thompson, K. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv20119
Plaintiff:
David Lee Powell
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Thompson, T. Brown, Warden Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahinte Thompson v. Leonta Jackson
as 20-3381
Respondent / Appellee:
LEONTA JACKSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAHINTE T. THOMPSON
THOMPSON et al v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2020cv14554
Defendant:
SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, JOHN DOE, ZHEJIANG HUABAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELE T THOMPSON, JAMES E. THOMPSON and MICHELE T. THOMPSON
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson, Jr. v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Clinton T. Thompson, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
