Cases 1 - 10 of 156
v. MURZIKE et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUKES v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
ISSAC JACIEL LUKES and ISAAC JACIEL LUKES
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, L. HAMBIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Thompson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv00781
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson and Wendy T Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Domroes v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roger Domroes
Defendant:
Julie White, Bryan Hilton, G.S. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21334
Plaintiff:
JORDAN T THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TAYLOR
Defendant:
T. THOMPSON, COLE and ZACHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CUPP et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
TRAE T. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NURSE L. CUPP, HEATHER, ELKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
