Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
T.C. v. City of San Diego et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02225
Plaintiff: T.C.
Defendant: City of San Diego, Chief of Police Dave Nisleit, Mara W. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
R.T.W. et al v. Guam Swimming Federation
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff: R.T.W., N.W., J.M. and others
Defendant: Guam Swimming Federation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Theodore Cabaniss v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 23-55297
Plaintiff / Appellant: THEODORE CABANISS, Guardian ad Litem to Minor Child T.C.
Defendant / Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Gateways for Youth & Families et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05041
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant: Gateways for Youth & Families fka Mentor House, J. S., A. N. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?