Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cosenza v. Hazelhurst, et al
as 23-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALE COSENZA
Defendant / Appellee:
WORCESTER, MA, JOHN DOHERTY and KERRY HAZELHURST
Defendant:
T.J. COAKLEY, MARK RICHARDSON, ALLAN BURNES and others
Cosenza v. Hazelhurst, et al
as 23-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATALE COSENZA
Defendant / Appellant:
KERRY HAZELHURST and JOHN DOHERTY
Defendant:
WORCESTER, MA, T.J. COAKLEY, MARK RICHARDSON and others
Ciarametaro v. City of Gloucester et al
as 1:2021cv10606
Defendant:
Charles "Chip" Payson, James Destino, Holly Dougwillo and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas "T.J." Ciarametaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pulte v. Tubbs et al
as 1:2018cv11412
Defendant:
Robert Tubbs, T.J. Investment, LLC, Judith Tubbs and others
Plaintiff:
William Pulte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cosenza v. City of Worcester et al
as 1:2018cv10936
Plaintiff:
Natale Cosenza
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Kerry Hazelhurst, John Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosenza v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv10936
Plaintiff:
Natale Cosenza
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Kerry Hazelhurst , John Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marzuq, et al v. Cadete Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 14-1744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GASSAN MARZUQ and TANISHA RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff:
LISA CHANTRE
Defendant - Appellee:
CADETE ENTERPRISES, INC., T.J. DONUTS, INC., SAMOSET ST. DONUTS, INC. and others
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. T.J. Bark Mulch, Inc.
as 1:2014cv10099
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
T.J. Bark Mulch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
