Cases 1 - 10 of 1,244
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Islas Carbajal et al v. 3606 Associates Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03500
Defendant:
Kia Nuen Tang, Siew Moy Low, 3606 Associates Inc. doing business as Pink Nori and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Islas Carbajal and Juan Carlos Islas Carbajal
Rikki Tang v. Raul H. Luna et al
as 8:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Rikki Tang
Defendant:
Raul H. Luna and DOES 1 to 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sethi v. Potomac Valley Orthopaedic Associates et al
as 8:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Navin Sethi
Defendant:
Potomac Valley Orthopaedic Associates, Potomac Valley Orthopaedic Associates, Chartered, Potomac Valley Orthopaedic Associates, a Division of Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tang v. Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd.
as 5:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tang
Defendant:
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zhaoshi v. Docoo
as 1:2024cv02793
Plaintiff:
Tang Zhaoshi
Defendant:
Docoo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
LIANG v. M & T RESTAURANT INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04443
Plaintiff:
JUN LIANG
Defendant:
M & T Restaurant Inc. and XIHONING TANG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
