Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Neal v. Lovett, et al
as 23-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOVETT, Warden, M. STARR, Wardeh, DEANTON, Associate Warden and others
Milous Brown v. David Gray, et al
as 21-3386
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN RUIZ, Unit Manager, A-Unit, PATRICK HALEY, Institutional Inspector, DAVID W. GRAY, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILOUS BROWN
Berryhill v. OK DOC Board Members, et al
as 14-6155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY, MARTY SIRMONS, Warden and others
Miller v. Scott, et al
as 14-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CORNELL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WADE SCOTT, O.S.P. Chaplain, ROBERT COMPTON, O.S.P. Food Service Superintendent, D. D. JOHNS, O.S.P. Food Service Supervisor and others
Berryhill v. Oklahoma Dept., et al
as 12-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, JUSTIN JONES, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY and others
Berryhill v. Henry, et al
as 10-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, T. BASS-LESURE, Oklahoma County Judge, VIRGIL C. BLACK, Oklahoma County Judge and others
In re: Berryhill
as 10-7053
Petitioner:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
Jackson v. Workman, et al
as 10-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden OSP, JUSTIN JONES, Director ODOC, HARRY READING, Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
