Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dutton v. Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc et al
as 4:2019cv01605
Defendant:
Brydger & Porras, LLP, The Law Offices of Sara J. Singer, Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Dutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Capital Finance, LLC v. Oscar Rosenberg
as 19-1202
Defendant / Appellant:
OSCAR ROSENBERG and JOSEF NEUMAN
Garnishee:
TD BANK, N.A., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., FIDELITY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TD Bank, N.A. v. Max Lowe Carland, Jr.
as 17-1413
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
MAX LOWE CARLAND, JR. and ELLEN C. CARLAND
Defendant:
CARLAND TRACTOR AND EQUIP., INC. and ANTHONY E. CARLAND
TD Bank, N.A. v. Biltmore Investments, LTD.
as 16-2327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
BILTMORE INVESTMENTS, LTD.
TD Bank, N.A. v. Biltmore Investments, LTD.
as 16-2327
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant / Appellant:
BILTMORE INVESTMENTS, LTD.
Sean Jackson v. Egira, LLC
as 16-2292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SEAN JACKSON, CRAIG A. KOEHLER, JR., RUSSELL P. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN MAYO
Defendant - Appellant:
EGIRA, LLC, trading as Speakeasy Saloon & Dinning House, ANASTASIA VASILAKOPOULOS, BILL VASILAKOPOULOS and others
Garnishee:
M&T BANK, JAZPAL, LLC, MBGC, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
