Cases 101 - 110 of 10,793
Johns v. Lumpkin
as 24-50014
Petitioner:
Jason Anthony Johns
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Henry Gonzales
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division, Brian Collier, Jimmy S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Lumpkin
as 24-10015
Petitioner:
Clarence Wyatt Holland
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40018
Petitioner:
Joshua Wiley Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Granger v. Lumpkin
as 24-70001
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Granger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
In re: Ivan Cantu
as 24-40110
Petitioner:
In re: Ivan Abner Cantu
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 23-11267
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Adam Gonzalez
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 24-40022
Petitioner:
Michael E. Geiger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Laura Haney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Rice v. Lumpkin
as 24-10071
Petitioner:
Reginald Donell Rice
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
