Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 8,786
Smith v. FCI Texarkana Warden
as 24-40142
Petitioner: Curtis Smith
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and FCI Texarkana Warden
Ponce v. Lumpkin
as 24-20134
Petitioner: Jose Luis Ponce
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Belmont v. Lumpkin
as 24-50102
Petitioner: Jose Carlos Belmont
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Collier
as 24-50229
Plaintiff: Charles Bonner
Defendant: Bryan Collier, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director of Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Puente v. Lumpkin
as 24-40190
Petitioner: Luis Fernando Puente
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-50092
Petitioner: Jakroi Allen Banks
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40193
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 24-70002
Petitioner: Amos Wells
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40186
Petitioner: Jose Garduno Guzman
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Little v. Lumpkin
as 24-10121
Petitioner: Paul La'Mark Little
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?