Cases 71 - 80 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-40318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephen McCollum, et al v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 17-20149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN MCCOLLUM, Individually, SANDRA MCCOLLUM, Individually and STEPHANIE KINGREY, Individually and as independent administrator of the Estate of Larry Gene McCollu
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, JEFF PRINGLE, KAREN TATE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-20647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
David Bailey, et al v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-20505
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARVIN RAY YATES, KEITH COLE, JACKIE BRANNUM and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, ROBERTO M. HERRERA and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ramey v. Livingston et al
as 3:2016cv00293
Defendant:
A.C.N.P. Robert B Armstrong, L.V.N. Jacob E. Barron, L.V.N. Ana Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ramey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
David Bailey, et al v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-20445
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID BAILEY, MARVIN RAY YATES, KEITH COLE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, ROBERTO M. HERRERA and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
