Cases
Hansen v. Bonath et al
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff: Heather Hansen
Defendant: Kyle K. Bonath, George C. Stoltz, Eric D. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Wetherbe v. Texas Tech University System, et al
as 19-11325
Defendant / Appellant: LANCE NAIL, PH.D., in his individual capacity only, MARGARET WILLIAMS, current Dean of Rawls College of Business at Texas Tech University, in her official capacity and TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Plaintiff / Appellee: JAMES C. WETHERBE, PH.D.
Case name not on file
as 3:2016mc00374
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-10458
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Willis v. Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-50300
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER SCHOOL OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM and others
Willis v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center et al
as 7:2009cv00117
Plaintiff: Robert Willis
Defendant: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Allied Health Sciences, Texas Tech University System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?