Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Parrish v. Attorney General of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Donte Darrell Parrish
Defendant:
Attorney General of Pennsylvania, County of York, Warden Adam Ogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abrantes v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Grace Abrantes
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Human Services, Colleen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Brigman v. Schaum et al
as 1:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
Lloyd James Brigman
Defendant:
Adam Schaum, Hellam Township Police Department, Pennsylvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ellberger et al v. Guichardan et al
as 3:2019cv00726
Defendant:
Teresa D Miller, William J O'Gurek, Susan Byrnes and others
Plaintiff:
Melody Ellberger and Daniel Leeper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. County of York et al
as 1:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Officer Patrick Gartrell, County of York, Chief Mark L. Bentzel and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo D. Jones, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
