Cases 41 - 50 of 87
MAY v. IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00764
Plaintiff:
LOUIS MAY
Defendant:
IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Thirdparty_defendant:
CFG, INC. , JOHN DOE DOCTORS and JOHN DOE NURSES
Cross_claimant:
IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cross_defendant:
ABC PUBLIC ENTITIES (1-10), CFG, INC. , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Jose Quintana
as 14-3549
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE QUINTANA
Respondent:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR
In re: Imani Abdus-Sabir
as 14-2058
Petitioner:
In re: IMANI ABDUS-SABIR
:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Nominal Respondent:
MARK FALK
DOURIET v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO DOURIET
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , DELANEY HALL DETENTION FACILITY , CITY OF NEWARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EVANS v. NEWARK CITY, et al
as 2:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS
Defendant:
Former Mayor, CORY A. BOOKER , Officer JOE HADLEY, Detective RASHID SABUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. NEWARK CITY, et al
as 2:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS
Defendant:
Former Mayor, CORY A. BOOKER , Officer JOE HADLEY, Detective RASHID SABUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stack Stackhouse v. Paula Dow, et al
as 13-4625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAULA T. DOW, CAROLYN MURRAY, LINDA CHILDSWIFT and others
WENDELL v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv06903
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WENDELL
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Sergio Rodriguez
as 13-3949
Petitioner:
In re: SERGIO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
