Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams v. The Kraft Heinz Company
as 5:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Sandra Adams
Defendant:
The Kraft Heinz Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Main Course Foodsolutions, Inc. v. The Kraft Heinz Company et al
as 3:2021cv01033
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Puerto Rico LLC and The Kraft Heinz Company
Plaintiff:
Main Course Foodsolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Kraft Heinz Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv02259
Defendant:
Alexandre Van Damme, Gregory E. Abel, Marcel Herrmann Telles and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Green, Charlotte Hays, Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Merritts v. 3G Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02071
Defendant:
David H. Knopf, 3G Capital Partners II LP, The Kraft Heinz Company and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Merritts, Sjunde AP-Fonden and Union Asset Management Holding AG
DeFabiis v. 3G Capital Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05580
Defendant:
3G Capital Partners, LP, 3G Global Food Holdings, LP, 3G Capital Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David DeFabiis
Nominal Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss
KAILAS v. HEES et al
as 2:2019cv00567
Defendant:
DAVID KNOPF, JOHN C. POPE, ALEXANDRE BEHRING and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA KAILAS
IN RE KRAFT HEINZ SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 2:2019cv00549
Defendant:
JOHN C. POPE, ALEXANDRE VAN DAMME, GREGORY E. ABEL and others
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REVOCABLE TRUST
Consolidated Plaintiff:
IAN GREEN, CHARLOTTE HAYS and STEPHEN SILVERMAN
APTARGROUP, INC. v. KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
APTARGROUP, INC.
Defendant:
KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY and THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY and KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
APTARGROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
