Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA et al
as 2:2024cv04707
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, THE EMBASSY OF CUBA, CUBAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
VILLOLDO et al v RUZ et al
as 2:2013mc00183
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO VILLOLDO and GUSTAVO E. VILLOLDO
Defendant:
FIDEL CASTRO RUZ, RAUL CASTRO RUZ, THE MINISTRY OF INTERIOR and others
VILLOLDO et al v. RUZ et al
as 2:2013mc00016
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO VILLOLDO and GUSTAVO F. VILLOLDO
Defendant:
FIDEL CASTRO RUZ, RAUL CASTRO RUZ, THE MINISTRY OF INTERIOR and others
ALDO VERA, JR., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Aldo Vera, Sr. v. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA
as 2:2012mc00309
Plaintiff:
ALDO VERA, JR., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Aldo Vera, Sr.
Defendant:
THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
