Cases 1 - 10 of 19,493
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz, Pavel M. v. State of Florida
as 4:2024cv10042
Plaintiff:
Pavel Martinez Ruiz
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Cris Moon
as 24-11437
Petitioner:
In re: CRIS MOON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States Of America v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv21702
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Dana Gonzalez, Armando Gonzalez, Florida Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Lockhart, Roderick v. State of Florida
as 0:2024cv60732
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Lockhart
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Codner v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60726
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Codner
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Governor Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marchan v. State of Florida
as 4:2024cv00613
Petitioner:
Ephrain Jr. Mark Marchan
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Louis Vereen, Jr. v. Wakulla Corectional Institution Admnistration, et al
as 24-11356
Petitioner:
LOUIS D. VEREEN, JR.
Respondent:
WAKULLA CORECTIONAL INSTITUTION ADMNISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
