Cases 1 - 10 of 1,201
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
DENAR ROYAL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner:
DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
FELICIA Y. SHELTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
TAEBEL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB and ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
REDWINE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
IMARI BUTLER
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
