Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Tyrone Price v. MI
as 24-1354
Petitioner: TYRONE PRICE
Respondent: STATE OF MICHIGAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1250
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Michael Jones #617568
Defendant: People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKennedy v. The State of Michigan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff: Calvin McKennedy
Defendant: The State of Michigan
Jones v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10502
Plaintiff: Michael Magik Jones
Defendant: MDOC, People of the State of Michigan and Ingham County Jail
Bailey v. People of the State of Michigan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv10486
Petitioner: Larry James Bailey
Respondent: People of the State of Michigan
Jonathon Edick v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1109
Petitioner: JONATHON EDICK and JONATHON LOYD EDICK
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, identified on initiating document as People of the State of Michigan
Price v. State of Michigan, People of
as 2:2023cv13014
Petitioner: Robert Jospeh-Lewis Price and Robert Joseph-Lewis Price
Respondent: State of Michigan, People of
Vandiver v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv12990
Plaintiff: Jerry Rick Vandiver
Defendant: State of Michigan and Michigan Department of Corrections Bureau of Healthcare Services
Boston Tompkins v. Unknown Part(y)(ies), et al
as 23-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant: BOSTON JERMAINE TOMPKINS
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Employees of the State of Michigan Department of Corrections, WARDEN MICHAEL BURGESS, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. BASSETT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?