Contract Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 184
SINKFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.
as 2:2023cv04684
Plaintiff: DEON SINKFIELD, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NOUVEAU ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, LLC v. VALIANT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22423
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NOUVEAU ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: VALIANT GROUP, LLC and COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
PODLUCKY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01899
Plaintiff: GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY and KARLA SUE PODLUCKY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2023cv01546
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. dba BARKER & BARKER PAVING and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. doing business as BARKER & BARKER PAVING
Nominal Defendant: SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF STEEL SUPPLIERS ERECTORS INC. v. WALSH FEDERAL LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02186
Plaintiff: U.S. EX REL. STEEL SUPPLIERS ERECTORS INC. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF STEEL SUPPLIERS ERECTORS INC.
Defendant: WALSH FEDERAL LLC, DAVE STEEL COMPANY INC. and THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant: Assa Abloy Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
HSBC BANK, USA v. SHIM et al
as 2:2023cv01245
Plaintiff: HSBC BANK, USA
Defendant: DAE SUNG SHIM, MRS. DAE SUNG SHIM, SUNG HO MO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
v. LUTTRELL et al
as 3:2023cv00922
Defendant: CHRISTINA LUTTRELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Type: Contract Insurance
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Co
as 23-1053
Plaintiff / Appellee: ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, an unincorporated association, by TROY STEPHENSON, CHRISTINA STEPHENSON, and STEVEN BARNETT, trustees ad litem, and alternatively, ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, by TROY STEPHENSON, CHRISTINA STEPHENSON, and STEVEN BARNETT
Defendant / Appellant: ERIE INDEMNITY CO
Appellant: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PENNSYLVANIA CHAMBER OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRY, AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION and others
Type: Contract Insurance
In re: Adrian Avena, et al
as 22-3228
Plaintiff / Appellant: In re: ADRIAN AVENA, as Owner and AA COMMERCIAL LLC, as Owner Pro Hac Vice, of the Fishing Vessel CONCH'RD, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellee: KIMBERLY WOLFE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Aaron Greenberg, and on behalf of K.G., over whom Kimberly Wolfe is the Appointed Co-Guardian, and who is the Surviving Minor Child of the Decedent, Aaron Greenberg,, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CM HAMMAR AB and others
Not Yet Classified: DANIEL J. AVENA
In re: Adrian Avena, et al
as 22-3132
Plaintiff / Appellee: In re: ADRIAN AVENA, as Owner and AA COMMERCIAL LLC, as Owner Pro Hac Vice, of the Fishing Vessel CONCH'RD, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant: KIMBERLY WOLFE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Aaron Greenberg, and on behalf of K.G., over whom Kimberly Wolfe is the Appointed Co-Guardian, and who is the Surviving Minor Child of the Decedent, Aaron Greenberg,
Appellee: DANIEL J. AVENA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CM HAMMAR AB and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?