Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,221
Nita Patel v. USA
as 24-1739
Plaintiff: NITA PATEL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BETTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05719
Petitioner: TIMOTHY C BETTERSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff: TITO HOSKINS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TOOMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01805
Plaintiff: DAVID TOOMER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05590
Petitioner: WISAM RIZK
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner: JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOWARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05434
Petitioner: RICHARD HOWARD
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff: MARK WOODS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff: SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant: K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?