Cases 41 - 50 of 16,911
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04645
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARK WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, DR. FARRAH AHMEDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
GARNET SMALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THOMPSON v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01445
Petitioner:
YOLANDA THOMPSON
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SALERNO v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04547
Plaintiff:
TERESA SALERNO
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Khawar Saleem v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1622
Petitioner:
KHAWAR SALEEM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown El Bey v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Marquis Brown El Bey
Respondent:
Warden Brian Emig, The Attorney General of the State of Delaware and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
M&T BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2024cv04561
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
JOULE v. KHAN et al
as 3:2024cv04472
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E JOULE
Defendant:
MUSTAQEEM A KHAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Laquan ReedIn re: Laquan Reed
as 24-1559
Petitioner:
In re: LAQUAN REED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
