Cases 11 - 20 of 74
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00798
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COURTROOM LEGISLATORS, JOE BIDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PHILLIP BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00779
Defendant:
PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN, CIA and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv02448
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. MATARELLI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv01687
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN SMITH, LLC
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HAMILTON, STATE OF INDIANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv03614
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
AUSTIN KYLE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03583
Plaintiff:
CHARISSE ILENE MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ST. ANGELO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02754
Plaintiff:
KURT ST. ANGELO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
as 1:2019cv02365
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCCURRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANTHONY MCCURRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL CURTIS HILL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
