Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Sullivan v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Leihinahina Sullivan
Defendant:
Warden Estelle Derr, Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tong vs. USA
as 1:2022cv00423
Petitioner:
Chun Mei Tong and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Agustin v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Justin E. Agustin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Troiano v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
James Troiano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Espinoza-Santos v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00414
Petitioner:
Noel Espinoza-Santos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farrar v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00399
Petitioner:
Douglas Farrar, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00212
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Grandinetti v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Vice President Michael Pence, Attorney General William Barr, Jeff Rosen and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naki v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00507
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Leslie K. Naki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
