Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Internal Revenue Services et al
as 2:2024cv01775
Defendant:
Gary Sinise, Internal Revenue Services, California Victim Compensation Board and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al v. GigaGen, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07205
Plaintiff:
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and The University of Chicago
Defendant:
GigaGen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Al Otro Lado, Inc. et al v. McAleenan, et al
as 3:2017cv02366
Plaintiff:
Al Otro Lado, Inc., Jose Doe, Beatrice Doe and others
Defendant:
Todd C. Owen, Elaine C. Duke, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Respondent:
DOES 1-10, inclusive
Amicus Curiae:
the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights at the University of Chicago Law School, Kids in Need of Defense, Members of Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 dj
Wright v. McGovern et al
as 3:2014cv05525
Plaintiff:
Franklin H Wright
Defendant:
Pops McGovern, Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym Ltd, Berger Shatz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duboff v. University of Chicago et al
as 3:2013cv00436
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Duboff
Defendant:
Bryan A. Garner, Lawprose, Inc. and University of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
NanoeXa Corporation v. The University of Chicago et al
as 5:2010cv02631
Plaintiff:
NanoeXa Corporation
Defendant:
The University of Chicago and UCHICAGO Argonne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Expert Microsystems, Inc. v. University of Chicago, et al
as 2:2009cv00586
Plaintiff:
Expert Microsystems, Inc.
Defendant:
University of Chicago and ARCH Development Corp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Exp Micro Systems v. Exp Micro Systems
as 2:2009at00318
Defendant:
Exp Micro Systems, University of Chicago and ARCH Development Corporation
Plaintiff:
Exp Micro Systems
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
