Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Wassef v. Nebel et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shafik Wassef
Defendant:
Kent Nebel and Thomas J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Brewbaker v. Miller
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Thomas J. Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Chad Brewbaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Miller v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2019cv00236
Petitioner:
Eric C Miller and Eric C. Miller
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs and Thomas J Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harper v. Miller
as 4:2019cv00010
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
Thomas J Miller
Plaintiff:
Laiveil DeVon Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borseth v. Callahan et al
as 6:2016cv02117
Plaintiff:
Justin Borseth
Defendant:
Nathan A. Callahan, Brian J. Williams, Thomas J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Gerhart et al
as 4:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
Defendant:
Nick Gerhart and Thomas J Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.: Coverage
Huston v. Smith et al
as 5:2013cv04063
Petitioner:
Paul Michael Huston
Respondent:
Jason Smith and Thomas J Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Texas Farm, LLC v. Miller
as 4:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Texas Farm, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas J Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
AgFeed Industries, Inc. et al v. Miller
as 4:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
AgFeed Industries, Inc. , M2 P2, LLC and Pork Technologies, LC
Defendant:
Thomas J Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
