Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Diamond Refractory Services, LLC v. AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc., et al.
as 26-2303
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND REFRACTORY SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
THOMAS BUNTING, JONATHAN PARSONS, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
:
AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al. v. AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc., et al.
as 25-4597
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND REFRACTORY SERVICES, LLC
:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS BUNTING, JONATHAN PARSONS and JOHN/JANE DOES, 1 through 5
Simmons v. Casella
as 24-2021
Defendant:
JOHN THORP, Fire Chief, individually, JOHN GOOCH, Building Inspector, individually, FRANCIS X. MURRAY, Mayor, individually and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE GRIFFIN, individually, CARIL SIMMONS, individually, and as administratix of the estates of Charles Griffin and Geraldine Griffin, deceased, CRAIG GRIFFIN and others
In the Matter of the Complaint of Atlantic Vessels Corp., Captain Lou Fleet, Inc., Mike's Party Boat Corp. v. Bunting
as 2:2020cv01534
Claimant:
Thomas Bunting
Petitioner:
Shareholders, Mike's Party Boat Corp., Atlantic Vessels Corp. and others
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Atlantic Vessels Corp., Captain Lou Fleet, Inc., Mike's Party Boat Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Diamond Refractory Services, LLC
Defendant:
AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc., Jonathan Parsons, John/Jane Doe Defendants 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin et al v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre et al
as 2:2014cv04491
Defendant:
Thomas Bunting, Daniel Casella, John Gooch and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Griffin, Craig Griffin, Lance Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
