Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GOODWIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04708
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN and MICHAEL GOODWIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CAPTAIN JAMES CLARK, DETECTIVE JAMES PITTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54086
Plaintiff:
BROCK THOMAS GAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBBS v. THE PHILA. POLICE DEPARMENT et al
as 2:2016cv05465
Plaintiff:
AMIN H. GIBBS
Defendant:
JAMES BURNS, JOHN KREWER, DONALD MARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Moody v. Jude Conroy, et al
as 16-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDE CONROY, Assistant District Attorney for the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, JOHN VERRECHIO, Detective for the Philadelphia Police Department and THOMAS GAUL, Detective for the Philadelphia Police Department, individually and in their official capacities
Brandon Moody v. Jude Conroy, et al
as 11-2386
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant - Appellant:
JUDE CONROY, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN VERRECCHIO, DETECTIVE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES and THOMAS GAUL, DETECTIVE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES
MOODY v. CONROY et al
as 2:2010cv02525
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant:
JUDE CONROY, JOHN VERRECHIO, THOMAS GAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARPENTER et al v. GAUL et al
as 2:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARPENTER, ARLENE CARPENTER, JENINE SHERARD and others
Defendant:
THOMAS GAUL, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and ROBERT WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
