Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Johnson v. Land et al
as 5:2015ct03110
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
E.C. Land, Thomas Asbell, Kevin Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2014cv00654
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Wilmington Health PLLC et al
as 7:2013cv00047
Defendant:
Wilmington Health PLLC, Thomas Johnson Beckett, Kristi Barger Simms, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
JOHNSON v. DUKE ENERGY RETIREMENT CASH BALANCE PLAN et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY RETIREMENT CASH BALANCE PLAN and DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Johnson v. Asbell et al
as 5:2013ct03038
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Kevin Lee and Dr. Land
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON and STEVE HOLLAND
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WILLIS, RONALD H. PEELER, BUNTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Joyner et al
as 5:2012ct03022
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Carlton Joyner, Officer Henry, Officer Tally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Howie et al
as 5:2011ct03205
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Howie, Carlton Joyner, Alvin W. Keller, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, MIKE FUQUAY, BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kay et al
as 5:2011ct03140
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Kay, Officer Brown, Jackie Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
