Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nelson et al v. Tranco Logistics, LLC
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson and Jaimie Nelson
Defendant:
Tranco Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
EPAC Technologies, Inc. v. Harper Collins Christian
as 19-5838
Not Yet Classified:
EPAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and HARPER COLLINS CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING, INC., fka Thomas Nelson, Inc.
EPAC Technologies, Inc. v. Harper Collins Christian
as 19-5836
Not Yet Classified:
EPAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and HARPER COLLINS CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING, INC., fka Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 3:2018oe00347
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EPAC Technologies, Inc. v. Thomas Nelson, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
EPAC Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Counter_plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
EPAC Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Nelson
as 3:2012cv00094
Petitioner:
United States of America and Chris Grimes
Respondent:
Thomas Nelson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Zondervan Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc. and Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Defendant:
Zondervan Corporation and Meredith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
