Cases 1 - 10 of 22
STEWARD v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00440
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEWARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HAUKE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00418
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
KEENAN R. HAUKE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SMOOT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00358
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, KRUGER and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HINDMAN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00323
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SMOOT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00318
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, KRUGER and others
Petitioner:
DONALD SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOFFREDI v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00314
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE and J.E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
ROBERT LOFFREDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMOOT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00309
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, KRUGER and others
Petitioner:
DONALD SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEARSON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00281
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SHORTRIDGE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00226
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
KELLY SHORTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MELENDEZ v. JULIAN et al
as 2:2017cv00202
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
ALEX A. MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
