Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Behrendsen v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Behrendsen
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Melander-Smith v. United States Postal Service et al
as 0:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sheri Melander-Smith
Defendant:
USPS, Postmaster Doe, Tiffany Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cooper v. Standard Insurance Company, The
as 0:2023cv02175
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Cooper
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HearingPro, Inc. et al v. Miracle-Ear, Inc.
as 0:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
HearingPro, Inc., Las Davis Enterprises, Inc. and Tiffany Davis
Defendant:
Miracle-Ear, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Spruill v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
as 0:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Spruill
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Elmore v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Elmore
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pitcock v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv02662
Petitioner:
Tiffani Pitcock
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Skibicki et al v. Walmart, Incorporated
as 0:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Skibicki and J.S.
Defendant:
Walmart, Incorporated
Bushey v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Tiffany F. Bushey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
