Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Timmy Wallace
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Timmy Wallace
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. New York Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv03414
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Defendant:
New York Police Department, Haskovic Harris, Michael Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Hector Joyner, R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Wallace
as 22-60
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Timmy Wallace
Wallace v. United States of America
as 21-458
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timmy Wallace
Wallace v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv07134
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Officer S. Howard, Nurse Price, Officer J. Preston and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00078
Defendant:
J. Adkins, J. Preston, Officer Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
