Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Salter v. Unknown
as 4:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Charles Aundraius Salter
Defendant:
Unknown, Shane Youngblood, Timothy Hatch and others
Servantez v. Hatch et al
as 1:2013cv00638
Petitioner:
Moises Servantez
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uecker v. Hatch et al
as 1:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Lee W. Uecker
Defendant:
Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Hatch et al
as 1:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Nick James Gonzales
Defendant:
Timothy Hatch and Jerry Roark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RJ et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
RJ , RR , BR and others
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc. , Corizon, Inc. , Mark Elliot Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Hatch et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
Michael Dixon
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ayala v. Hatch, et al
as 13-2009
Petitioner - Appellant:
GABRIEL AYALA
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HATCH, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Romero v. Hatch
as 1:2012cv01082
Petitioner:
Estevan Phillip Romero
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch and The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Hatch, et al
as 12-2136
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR PAUL MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HATCH, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Huband v. Hatch
as 1:2012cv00805
Plaintiff:
Donald Huband
Defendant:
Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
